PATRIARCHY
1900 - 1960

 

War 20th Century
100 Million Dead

 

MATRIARCHY
1960 - 2020

 

Abortion 2 Billion Dead
2 Billion Contra-Conceived

State Versus Citizen
Left 400 Million Dead
Right  100 Million

 

  State Supports more women than men do. Death of Family, Extended Family and most marriages. Human pain-immense and incalculable damage to children

Men house everyone on their own earnings or build almost all structures themselves.
Longevity similar to women and murder or death related violence rare.

 

 

  Huge homeless population grows and grows; divorce causes enormous increased demands on extra accommodation.
Matriarchy becomes infamous for its 'death culture'-abortion, infanticide, suicide, homocide, poisonings and violent murder. It is based on killing. No wonder.

 With population growing people said unstoppably- "You could walk out of one job and cross the road straight into another" Virtually nil unemployment. All natural products- organically based. From the earth or close to it. Little pollution.

 

 

 

 

   With increased competition from the reserve army of 'unemployed' women wages drop in real terms. Manufacturing turns to cheap toxic chemicals- the old pharmecopia returns; majic potions like artificial estrogen that have a left leaning sinister atomic bond in their molecular structures- as most chemical-ie Pharmecopian food has. Artificial food leads to artificial unhealthy lifestyles. Flouride used as a soporific to lull prisoners in Hitlers camps prior to death.
 Economy Grows    Economy in the West Tanks.
 Population grows.    European Population shrinks alarmingly.
 Jobs and careers grow.    Real full-time jobs disappear

 Government is small

 

   Government takes up two thirds of the expenditure economy but only one tenth of the productive economy

 Productivity soars.

 

 

   Inflation increases and accumulates. Inflation is the true bottom line measure of productivity. Productivity and spending power both decrease year on year.

 Government respects privacy and personal rights and freedoms.
Perverts are outlawed and have no access to children.
Men form half the teachers in NZ- still the standard around most of the Western World.



What is there not to like about PATRIARCHY?

 

 Government invades all private rights and imposes strict restrictive laws on peoples rights and opinions- you have no right 'to be wrong' in the views you hold. Speech crimes and the Dictionary Police abound.


What good is there to like about MATRIARCHY?

 

Sex    
Rape or Sexual Assault    
Child Mortality    
Length of Life    
Overall Health    
Birth    
Income    
Taxes    
Death    
Work    

 

Systems of Guilt    
Legal Oppression    
Roles    
Duties    
Expectations    
Responsibility    
Accountability    
Leadership    
Power    
Ownership    

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

Masculist Book recommendations

These are the books this whole site references for its authority
 Everything stated here is backed up by one or other of books like these.
However I consider their 'interpretations' weak and their recommendations for ACTION- in the light of population, economic, political and massive government funding biases to be highly regretable at best. For instance their recommendations are small in scale or dismissively 'ironic' as if we were talking about some tiny 'bad joke' incident.
The ramifications as to the survival of Western Civilization is really what at stake- and thus the deeper ironies run in precisely the opposite direction; how will feminism survive if it successfully destroys the so called capitalist/patriarchy/deep state structures on which it so seriously depends?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

Empowering MEN
Questioning Feminism

 

Men speaking out

 This website is interested in one thing.
Creating Winning Arguments & Debate Points
to move beyond the matriarchy or even to ending feminist ideology. Especially in its malignant aspects that involve the West

There is no interest here in any soft accommodations with University women or with  radical feminism.  Just for being female-and having an ideology alone to back them. Men have lived too long in a matriarchal environment that over rode men’s human rights at every turn: without an answering call from a male supportive gender consciousness that put the case for men on each issue.  Foolishly we really did trust women to be self policing; self critical and logically analytical as they outlined their position. It was theirs and theirs alone so we left them to it. Trusting they knew what they were talking about, why would they need us to speak alongside them- nor did we demand such.  How foolish was our trust. For they were creating a massive ideological war against us all the time; viciously denigrating men, boys, the male gender and masculinity with an arrogant sneer and livid representations full of unjust bile and huge hot polemics raging fully unleashed upon us behind our backs. 

 

They Waged War Unbidden

The lone voice heard was overwhelmingly female. Feminism is not always 50/50 when it comes to men’s poverty, men’s housing needs to be met (men are 90% or more of the homeless) or post divorce access and shared custody of children and asymmetric court outcomes that heavily favour women.  In the range of 90% women to 10 percen men having access, custody or care of children. Plus hundreds more urgent issues relevant to men. Thus masculist ideas are necessary to properly formulate Liberation for all men. Feminism-from its name on- singularly omits to do. Name one politically funded program promoted by women for men? cannot do it: neither can I think of one idea from feminism that builds up men’s consciousness: as a gender considered already OK. Something we are good for-emanating from feminist theory itself-free from ‘male roles’ perhaps? Yet we are still required to perform them right? It is only theory for feminism; that men have rights too, plus issues that need fixing- though not by men themselves? They want to get rid of us-unless it is to pay the bills, pay attention to their narcissism, or pay the penalty for their false accusations. We have to fix women’s ‘issues’ but to feminism men are the issue. A new version of the blame game- much like the Catholic church; another system of guilt.  Not even paid parental leave for men. This website is a complete, feminist ending: Revolution for men.
 
We are , finally, moving on from the matriarchy.

 

Not Supremacism: SURVIVAL!

Women have their ‘feminist freedom illusion’  now for more than fifty years. By treachery and betrayal have failed to do their minor part. To have the children required for our collective future together. Yet laid claim to only the best and major of men’s more necessary world as if they too had earned the rights to it.  Forgetting conveniently the competitive, earned cost of many another mans risky failure down the other end of society; what Dr Warren Farrell calls the ‘glass cellar’.  Men succeeded as CEO’s because fierce competition weeded out the Darwinian unfit; women do not undergo this process, but cheat through a lying ideology and false statistics to put forward their completely spurious claims.  Therefore these ‘feminist CEOs will fail when the going gets rougher. ‘This sham succeeded for half a Century because men could not think matriarchal tyranny to be so bold in their delusion. As being unaware of the costs involved that only the male gender truly bore. Failing miserably to do their part in even having the children necessary for the future good of Western society.
This is already causing the imminent collapse of Western culture and ethnic integrity. As in, for example;  the furiously ‘nannified’ state of Greece. Thus their false ‘freedom’ is a mirage. Biting the future hand of the body that feeds and nourishes them.  All of them will be destroyed in a feminist driven population economy collapse – currently in its easy ‘austerity’ phase.
Later it will be even harder.
Men are ready to do their necessary part with cooperating female thinkers like Masculist women. Women who are pro-men. Not ‘feminized’ men.  The masculist revolution for masculine men is already here. Wussies betray us.
We belong already to the future. Working MEN of the world unite!
We have nothing to lose but these hideous feminist chains.

We are not interested in whining but in winning.
Masculists do not complain, they do.
This is the best defense for the male gender.
By men, for men.  This is a Revolution for alpha men by men alone.
Men influence the future in the public economy.
The currency of women is private community.
Women influence the future through the children.
This feminine networking is free. This is female freedom.

Men’s economy is productive. It is public and creates many permanent masculine things like bridges, roads, highways, necessary to all of society.
Women’s economy is intimate, private and of feelings. It is close, committed and full of children. No woman is more happy than a woman with children. This is her investment in the future.
The feminist failure to do this creates collapse.
Men deserve to vote for the  masculine future.
Men’s currency is shared money; it belongs to them exclusively.
It is a convenient abstract bill-of-exchange for all the other permanent deals and structures other men create.

Moving On From the Matriarchy

 

Women mixing in the male economy of production gravitate toward the repeat types of work; you know, repeat-repeat, copycat stuff that is not really innovative or risky. Men do the big stuff still. Women the little itty bitty flim flam things, the things that are n i c e yet unnecessary.
Masculist Men do the necessary things, the things no one wants to do. The real shit work of society. The women’s economy outside of the house is a flim flam economy; nice yet not necessary. Oh yeah, they still do ‘work’ but it is not cumulative, you cannot build on it; it is just repeat, repeat. Re-productive =copy.
They are still re-productive, but out of place.

Men are productive, public; and do the necessary masculist things.
Money is necessary, respect is necessary in the male exchange economy.
Women’s economy in the wrong place is a flim flam economy.
Women’s economy of love and intimacy in the right place breeds happiness for all.
Feminism alone is selfish elevation for a very few elite early adopters.
The later women pay the price for their success; 50% divorce rate equals probable destitution and a permanent old age in poverty.
Three jobs and still in debt is not the rosy future feminism promised.
Because their are no customers for your work- you did not have them!

Competition is man’s field but even men give up (dead beat dads caused by misplaced feminist production aura!) – it is especially pointless.
Men’s production is useful for all.

The feminist equality does not work for men; it means laid off, no work, no kids, no family, poverty and discrimination against men so widespread that feminism is an evil joke filled with bitterness.

Masculists change all that.

 

FIGHTING FOR SURVIVAL: 12 Reasons Why Feminism Fails the WEST Kindle Edition

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

Politically Incorrect Culture Studies

 

Notes

 Cult of Culture; the new liberal religion- transcendent but amoral- claiming ‘not to be judged’ or to be held responsible – yet; nuremburg showed otherwise with Rosenberg- writer hanged for war crimes; peace crimes? Crimes against universal civil society?

Manipulating society by weakening the cultural basis of Society

Jews own most of the pornography industry; is this correct?- provable?

UN and Green movement founded by big oil and General Motors via the club of Rome.

 

Later coopted by Communists/ ie Big Statists; Tax is theft- reworking Proudhon

Big State and Corporations bear a size relationship; they recognize each other

Connections: Jewish oil explorer/ – founds Dia Art Foundation and supports Rosalind Krauss and October Magazine (Revolution Date?) who write obliging article on supposed Earth Art/ Ecological \\\’symbols\\\’ by equally cynical artists. Where the art in fact acts to hold prime mineral land under longish sequestation at low rates lodged with public bodies as art is thought to be a public good.

 Communism as coercive (fascistic) regime; derived from Jonothan Swift Gullivers ‘ideal’ travels… comparative government; descriptive but not prescriptive… on the ground history proves it unworkable.

Connection 2: How do you sell a car? Speed? Safety? What?…

Example of the dilemma: do you sell car or what it represents: Barthes Mythologies or McLuhan would be useful here.

Example sausages: You sell the sizzle not the sausage.

You sell what it represents: quick hot foot eaten standing up like a man: Barbies and whatnot. Fat and cheap meat leftovers is actually what it is.

So you sell the activity around such an occassion and depict it as such.

Now back to the car: Problem.

You do NOT sell a hunk of metal, sitting by the sidewalk.

Nor the safety speed or whatever; a contradiction anyway.

Choice, fittings, electronic features, airbags and so on: but how do you depict the car culture? How do you show the car in its cultural importance to the individual and sell him/or her, that dream. And what exactly is that dream; determined of course by surveys and suchlike. The dream of travel individual determined. The freedom of the individual.

The freedom of the open road.

One is not sold traffic jams.

 Cars are mostly sold alone; for after all most Cars perform the same job.

And on the open road wheeling freely; chewing up the landscape effortlessly.

Did you know a cloverleaf highway intersection takes up forty acres of prime arable land: enough to feed forty or more families for life.

 

So began our long journey into the overpopulation myth.

Remember in the frontispiece to the Original editions of the Club of Rome Reports;

acknowledgement was made of the support given by the Chrysler Foundation, Ford Foundation, Volkswagen Foundation AND so on.

They had to get our concern FOR people away from land for food for people, so they could make empty land … dead land for cars. The open road means profits while it kills the ideology of \\\’people\\\’ for people. Deadly idea huh. Feminism & Jobs so that women would buy cars- they did...in the end at the costs of a mans whole life ie car, business, home, ...now 36 Million homeless MEN in USA.

 

Similarly for oil… oil needs cars to lift prices; they are there too in a two pronged approach.

Hence the myth of people as a \\\’virus\\\’: like Dawkins calling religion a virus.

Motor cars are what  is eating up space on planet earth; motorways that could grow food for fifty billions of people.

They had to get rid of us: Hence the Rockefeller support of MOMA; Museum of Modern Art and of the United Nations both in New York.

How were they to buy or pay for these cars?

Both the green movement and the communist UN (to bring in taxes to pay for Continental Highways) are supported by the Big Oil Companies and the Motor Corporations; in fact they virtually founded them, created and nourished them into existence.

 

Believe what you will, just do not be naive.

 

 

 

 

Masculist Book recommendations

These are the books this whole site references for its authority
Everything stated here is backed up by one or other of books like these.
However I consider their 'interpretations' weak and their recommendations for ACTION- in the light of population, economic, political and massive government funding biases to be highly regretable at best. For instance their recommendations are small in scale or dismissively 'ironic' as if we were talking about some tiny 'bad joke' incident.
The ramifications as to the survival of Western Civilization is really what at stake- and thus the deeper ironies run in precisely the opposite direction; how will feminism survive if it successfully destroys the so called capitalist/patriarchy/deep state structures on which it so seriously depends?

 

 

 

 

 

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

Property is Theft. Prodhouns political equation the first one I shall deal with.

 There are others... coming

Variations

 

Property is theft
Taxes as theft

theft as property (of socialism)
Discuss
theft as theft
 property as property
The ubiquitous tautology approach
Proudhoun as property- did he have royalties ad hominem not a defeat but a logic fallacy to ... nevertheless interesting to ask
the property/ies of proudhoun; anarchism as theft (of use value via destruction; ie no one else can thieve it or own it care for it or maintain it)

theft is property more attempted to be 'accumulative- in a purer form than capital or landlordism or ownership... etc'

Comparisons

Communism as theft

Democracy as theft

Monarchy as theft etc...

 

Contradictions

Poverty as theft, theft as theft (thieves steal from other thieves so/yet the thieving 'community loses out overall result= not encouraging... but thieves...incorrigible thieves...still do it; ie not laziness but the DRAMATIC if temporary acquisition of goods; an illusion if as a way to run society; of thieves?') The lazy would inherit anything/everything...probably just any old thing as in communism; notorious bad products.

IE Keynes versus Bastiat?

 

 

 

 

 

Masculist Book recommendations

These are the books this whole site references for its authority
Everything stated here is backed up by one or other of books like these.
However I consider their 'interpretations' weak and their recommendations for ACTION- in the light of population, economic, political and massive government funding biases to be highly regretable at best. For instance their recommendations are small in scale or dismissively 'ironic' as if we were talking about some tiny 'bad joke' incident.
The ramifications as to the survival of Western Civilization is really what at stake- and thus the deeper ironies run in precisely the opposite direction; how will feminism survive if it successfully destroys the so called capitalist/patriarchy/deep state structures on which it so seriously depends?

 

 

 

 

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

Subcategories

Fundamentally radically rooted and revolutionary ideas