Politically Incorrect Culture Studies



 Cult of Culture; the new liberal religion- transcendent but amoral- claiming ‘not to be judged’ or to be held responsible – yet; nuremburg showed otherwise with Rosenberg- writer hanged for war crimes; peace crimes? Crimes against universal civil society?

Manipulating society by weakening the cultural basis of Society

Jews own most of the pornography industry; is this correct?- provable?

UN and Green movement founded by big oil and General Motors via the club of Rome.


Later coopted by Communists/ ie Big Statists; Tax is theft- reworking Proudhon

Big State and Corporations bear a size relationship; they recognize each other

Connections: Jewish oil explorer/ – founds Dia Art Foundation and supports Rosalind Krauss and October Magazine (Revolution Date?) who write obliging article on supposed Earth Art/ Ecological \\\’symbols\\\’ by equally cynical artists. Where the art in fact acts to hold prime mineral land under longish sequestation at low rates lodged with public bodies as art is thought to be a public good.

 Communism as coercive (fascistic) regime; derived from Jonothan Swift Gullivers ‘ideal’ travels… comparative government; descriptive but not prescriptive… on the ground history proves it unworkable.

Connection 2: How do you sell a car? Speed? Safety? What?…

Example of the dilemma: do you sell car or what it represents: Barthes Mythologies or McLuhan would be useful here.

Example sausages: You sell the sizzle not the sausage.

You sell what it represents: quick hot foot eaten standing up like a man: Barbies and whatnot. Fat and cheap meat leftovers is actually what it is.

So you sell the activity around such an occassion and depict it as such.

Now back to the car: Problem.

You do NOT sell a hunk of metal, sitting by the sidewalk.

Nor the safety speed or whatever; a contradiction anyway.

Choice, fittings, electronic features, airbags and so on: but how do you depict the car culture? How do you show the car in its cultural importance to the individual and sell him/or her, that dream. And what exactly is that dream; determined of course by surveys and suchlike. The dream of travel individual determined. The freedom of the individual.

The freedom of the open road.

One is not sold traffic jams.

 Cars are mostly sold alone; for after all most Cars perform the same job.

And on the open road wheeling freely; chewing up the landscape effortlessly.

Did you know a cloverleaf highway intersection takes up forty acres of prime arable land: enough to feed forty or more families for life.


So began our long journey into the overpopulation myth.

Remember in the frontispiece to the Original editions of the Club of Rome Reports;

acknowledgement was made of the support given by the Chrysler Foundation, Ford Foundation, Volkswagen Foundation AND so on.

They had to get our concern FOR people away from land for food for people, so they could make empty land … dead land for cars. The open road means profits while it kills the ideology of \\\’people\\\’ for people. Deadly idea huh. Feminism & Jobs so that women would buy cars- they did...in the end at the costs of a mans whole life ie car, business, home, ...now 36 Million homeless MEN in USA.


Similarly for oil… oil needs cars to lift prices; they are there too in a two pronged approach.

Hence the myth of people as a \\\’virus\\\’: like Dawkins calling religion a virus.

Motor cars are what  is eating up space on planet earth; motorways that could grow food for fifty billions of people.

They had to get rid of us: Hence the Rockefeller support of MOMA; Museum of Modern Art and of the United Nations both in New York.

How were they to buy or pay for these cars?

Both the green movement and the communist UN (to bring in taxes to pay for Continental Highways) are supported by the Big Oil Companies and the Motor Corporations; in fact they virtually founded them, created and nourished them into existence.


Believe what you will, just do not be naive.





Masculist Book recommendations

These are the books this whole site references for its authority
Everything stated here is backed up by one or other of books like these.
However I consider their 'interpretations' weak and their recommendations for ACTION- in the light of population, economic, political and massive government funding biases to be highly regretable at best. For instance their recommendations are small in scale or dismissively 'ironic' as if we were talking about some tiny 'bad joke' incident.
The ramifications as to the survival of Western Civilization is really what at stake- and thus the deeper ironies run in precisely the opposite direction; how will feminism survive if it successfully destroys the so called capitalist/patriarchy/deep state structures on which it so seriously depends?






What do you think?

Send us feedback!