WHY MEN LEAD IN RESPONSIBLE SOCIETY

 


THE DEADLY ECONOMIC ARGUMENT: Part 1 of 3

 


    (NB: Note-there are other arguments on this website as fatal to feminism as this one.)

 


Sick of fighting rearguard small outbreak fires against feminist success in society again and again? Miss getting at the root of the big blaze? To put it out once and for all- for that we need theory, masculist theory getting at the root of their blaze. Radix means root- so what is needed is something beyond Christina Hoff Sommers and Dr Warren Farrell- for whom we can thank for data and facts as ammunition in our fight against an alienating divisive feminism. Radical masculist theory dispenses with feminist thinking entirely- we do not trust it. Its facts are 'cherry picked'-you know what that is? It means they select the very few isolated minority examples from a hundred question survey; highlight ten in a report, all of these ten favour the case they want to make; then out of the report further highlight just the two very 'best' of all for their case presented in a press release- this is what goes out to all the media. A simple communist like propaganda exercise. Only this time all men suffer.

Naturally the best data for any mens case is kept out of view in the seldom seen, requested or viewed original full survey results. This is the entirety of feminist data collecting methodology in a nutshell. Needless to say all this is in women's control. Thus all feminist data sources, information, surveys etc are completely bogus. None are to be trusted. No men are included except by accident. Thus all feminist data is skewed by over fifty percent from the outset. This is the biggest oversight of all and condemns both feminist data gathering as irrelevant and thus feminism itself as the most suspect and dodgy social engineering project ever.

It cannot be made right when its foundations are so false, inaccurate and misleading. Men should more than protest. They should renounce all support for it. It is merely institutionalized bigotry, discrimination and prejudice against men. Feminism is a hate crime; pure and simple.

 


PREAMBLE

 


Women have supposed feminism to speak for some of them. Yet they too lack an all encompassing attempt at a philosophy of a female gender.

There is an attempt by Professor Judith Butler of Columbia University to convey notions playing with the idea of gender as a whole from a lesbian perspective, where she says 'gender is performative'; but this fails when we see, in contrast, that it is sexuality that 'performative' for we mark off the very body items that perform the sexuality; ie 'fisting', 'anal fisting', 'anal''vaginal', 'full frontal' ('body' is strongly implied) and so on.

Contrary to Butler then I can say gender is fixed as in this workable definition of gender: 'gender is that which engenders the next generation'. On that rock of course the entirety of feminism, let alone Butler's theory, completely founders.

 


Democracy is rule of the Majority.

Feminism is rule of the elite white women's privilege party; ie Radical Feminists.

It actually advances just a very few limited people.

What is included as subject is very small.

This includes queer theory, control freak statists, post colonial theory, loser loony left and confused post modernists; all the tiny fringe politically correct. But no advocates of their opposite- presumed silenced in the onslaught of their one sided propaganda. More on that in my book.

 


Just as in the Socialist Bloc; the party becomes the elite. Masculism is therefore feminisms Prague Spring or Arab uprising. We will win in the end.

Meanwhile the lives of most women, as mothers, wives, girlfriends, females, daughters, sisters have been unchanged by feminism. Except in that it ruins their relationships with men. Feminism is merely a spoilsport movement yet reveals a hidden matriarchal overlordship called femdom: or, the hidden criminal matrilineal gang that truly does rule the world. Or at least is trying to take over the former Christian Western Hemisphere. More on that in my book.

 


Men need a more democratic new ideology to speak for us. It is called masculism. We include all straight women as our friends, all hetero-normative or normal men. All men on the receiving end of feminist taunts; go ahead accuse away- you have just made us a new convert for free. More on that in my book. These are the vast majority of people, the so called proletarian underclass. Workers of the world unite and throw off Communism!

Political Background

 


Just as right and left have no political meaning whatever; as both have concentration gulags, internal passports and slave labour; so the term 'equality' has no meaning at all within feminist propaganda. It merely means 'what is good for feminist radicals politically'. And equality in their incomes as professional government supported radicals. That last phrase should make all our flesh cringe. The fringe has become the establishment. An establishment oppresing men and suppressing all discussion of it. How alienating can you get.
Plainly; men and women are different. Biology is neutral; it enforces a choice of its own, even hormonally. Maintaining the fiction of gender equality is just not good science, biology, physiology and so on; it flies in the face of the best human breeding strategy for political wellbeing, happiness and joyful prosperity. Feminism, like socialism cannot work. These pages will attempt to show how feminism is an artificial construct that causes alienation, fear, injustice, rape, violence and all the thingsd it accuses others of in a selfish narcissistic way. Feminism is nothing more than the sum of its contradictions; the resultant equals zero. Meaning, a total waste of time.

Today, Feminism is dead; long live men, women and children.

A benign patriarchy is the only proven way to proceed. Enjoy. Salut! Cheers.

 


This is an anti-feminist website; Proudly so- without any shame, apology or confession necessary. Feminism- if you have read more than a few feminist books, like I have- especially the early canonical ones where their crude rougher, earlier theorizing is unguarded and fairly revealing - they also contain arguments that have since become mainstream-so they are a quick read-as you will no doubt already be familiar with their writings; still it is easier to examine any lapses in logical reasoning, facts or attitudes- of which there are plenty! So that it can be almost enjoyably in a grim sort of way to at last confront the silliness of what had been for us/you/men a fairly frightening beast- full of hatred of men.Which it is, but on such a faulty basis and misrepresentation that it is almost comically criminal.

 


    Men did not read much feminist literature in the past. I read Germaine Greers 'The Female Eunuch' long ago, and still haven't really (I have a biggish collection of older feminist literature coming from the second hand book shops for my research material) read many feminist books. The key one to read is Christina Hoff Sommers book; 'Who Stole Feminism'

 


We are then an Embattled Manhood Fighting Back, against Feminist death and post-modern new-speak: let us account for ourselves now. Women are unfit to rule men in any capacity whatever; as proven in the lies of femnism and feminist statistics. (Sommers)(Farrell) (Denfield) (Heather MacDonald)

For Men, By Men; For Men's interests, Male politics; mens children may cost thousands (feminists killing them saves that; oh yes) but kept alive past twenty years of age, could otherwise have gone on to economic activity, making millions EACH per lifetime. Up to $17,000,000 each per lifetime economic activity (overall;on average). All figures approximate New Zealand rates,  proportions, numbers and so on, yet apply equally-in proportion to almost any another Western Democracy on the OECD model.A colossal loss, gone forever: and for what? ( With say up to $17 Million each, per lifetime; of lost economic activity.)

 


    The compounded lifetime cost of foregone 'economic activity' coming up in the next sd the at $15 million per living grown child then it is as much as $6 Trillion NZ dollars. Or $60 Trillion dollars counting excess contraception also.. Forget about the so- called 'demographic transition' only stupid white people have fallen for that sophistry; abstractions do not do anything, take responsibility or help in any way. Turn something into an abstraction and you can talk about it until a dead cow comes home from the meatworks; it'll never happen that way. The intellectuals are wrong (as always) you are invited to save the planet for western civilization amoung the worlds peoples, tongues, cultures and indigenous ethnic minorities; which we are now, and accelerating OECD modekl. downwards.. This is real mate, we could have had these but did not; Now do you agree with it? Next time you lose your job think about it.

 


When you think about it none of the above includes 'children's children', or 'children's children's children' which would itself 'accelerate' the sums lost geometrically upwards by many times. Yet it would be perfectly correct to use them as it is the long run time effects, especially 'lifetimes' working lives of 'economic activity', longevity of '70 years' that are utilized in this essay.

Our Demographic Erebus

 


WE are heading for a big crash with 'the real' as Jean lyyotard says. A huge gradient of debt combined with a huge exponential gradient of lost natalist potential. When I was fifteen I chose art as my career because it always had something to look forward to: it was said that the paintings of 'old men' were best: and approximately twice the population we actually have was projected forward. By the time of my death this population, all of the then current Kiwi mix would have been around twelve million or more; about three times what we now actually have. I have an unproven axiom in Population economics; that the failure to reach ones population potential by half means that you will collapse to around half of what you do have; or, in other words a quarter of the original optimum.Meaning a drop in the economy of around seventy five percent. Since we have barely a third of potential: our fate is now much worse than that at one ninth off potential; just above ten percent; say, around 11 or 12%. We can look forward, if my unproven population axiom is correct, (Population Economy is nothing if not extremely direct in its implications., though far more accurate and reliable than classical supply side economics), to a nett or gross loss in all sectors to over 88% percent of all current evaluations. This is a massive, and fairly permanent loss and outright collapse of our western way of life. Since population depredations began so long ago with the rise of feminism it is undoubtedly to blame; as the law changes came later than the ideology.

New Zealand feminist women stole it from you! Feminism stole your job, career and your entire future; probably your family, marriage, wife, lover, house, car, savings, holidays, fun, joy of life, that and all your other dreams, every single one. Now are you angry men? You should be.

Male Rule is Natural

 


And that is just one tenth of it all. More to come. Google for 'Population Economy' to see how real, credible and plausible all this is. Otherwise, this site is the only one in the entire world; another New Zealand 'World First'- to put it all anywhere near like this.

 


    ECONOMICALLY, compounded, the accumulated result is mega trillions of dollars lost; of generalised 'economic activity ', mostly amoung the first world OECD countries. Trillions alone even in New Zealand. Probably over $7,000 Trillions over seventy years for the USA; and similar for Europe.

    Yes, I say, Trillions of dollars over the next seventy years LOST to little old NZ alone. A country you have never heard of? The USA sum of $7,000 trillions is pretty well worth considering; as the direct onflowing costs in lost economic activity due to feminism; and we want to recommend this to the World? Thank god for them that they are NOT listening. The next world war Asia will win.

 


No more.

 


Masculine Leadership for winning Our living Children's Sustainable and prosperous future Culture.

 


New Zealand gave women the vote in 1893. Since we invented its construction, we have the duty of care to the rest of the world to dismantle it. To take away its mantle of authority. To destroy its authorship; to deny it our patrimony. Now is the time to reconsider that option.

Men died to win the vote; what did women do but continually work to destroy the economy. Economoia is 'household management' and they are appallingly bad, or short-sightedly evil keepers of the kitchen accounts; we must divorce THEM, now. Socially, politically and entirely from out of the public sphere. They do not deserve any further consideration at all. Death is dead. Long live life.

 


Feminists kill millions of mainly European citizens; European men sacrifice their own bodies and lives wresting life for them in dangerous daily occupations. What then do they do for us? What return or reward do they give us? Nothing but heartache and despair. They do not deserve the vote. We died for it. They murder our future. New Zealand owes a duty of care to the world to be the first to reverse the communities destruction. We care, they kill. We bring life. They death. Life must win or all of us are lost. Rise up men. Destroy the ideology of the ones who kill us all. Destroy feminism by whatever means. It is death to us all. It is death to our own indigenous and European culture. Destroy that which destroys us. If your'e a man. Freedom awaits! Rise up.

 


 

 


Indigenous Europeans were once 20% of the family of man: culturally honouring their own mana, geneology, ancestors and whakapapa in Goethe, Mozart, Shakespeare, Milton, Titian, Constable and Rembrandt; Picasso, Schoenberg, Philip Glass, Thelonius Monk, John Ashberry, Julian Schnabel. Now they are an endangered human species, where such a cultural heritage is dishonoured, forgotten and set aside. We barely remember who we are. Where do you stand, O artist?

Working fodder for feminism is nothing worth dying for or risking lives for 'equal' pay. Men deserve more for the risks they run and the responsibility they undertake out of love for their children and families; not for the state to steal their families from them. The nanny-matriarchal state is a rival to mens estate; literally legally and politically. In the bedroom the state is a rival husband who delivers more money, power and rights to your so-called wife than you can yourself. Rise up men and throw this interloper out of your bedroom, out of your love-life and out of your house.

If we do not have sovereign freedom there where do we have it? Nowhere is a cause for universal alarm and completely legitimate political anger. Things have worked upon us to our detriment. People have deliberately organized an eradication of our cultural group and ethnic pride. Marxist Feminism is practicings its own brand of ethnic cleansing in slow demographic notions, hoping we do not notice.

Phillip O'Sullivan the artist, writer, webmaster and videographer does notice and loudly declares our cultural rights and freedoms.Both as men and human beings. It is our intent to restore our world and the best political environment for sustaining European culture: we must do demographically what other indigenous peoples have themselves the right to do: in order to prosper and grow culturally and economically.

 


Masco-Europa

 


Phillip John O'Sullivan

Title: EUROPA : Coloured Oil Pastel Drawing on Archival Card

Dimension: 210mm X 300mm

Price: $3450

 


Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 


See other website at www.philliposullivan.co.nz

Our European Integument

 


Masculism is necessary especially for the economic relief of European nations or founded on European peoples. It is the very humanist liberalism (of which a too tolerated Marxist Feminism holds ideological sway, forming the dominant ideological mindset of these nations) that is the sole conscious source of our undoing. Necessary for the health of an otherwise biased, bigoted and intolerant critical cultural theory to undo all its damages.

Presented here is its opposite, in sardonic, parodic and sarcastic form. As critical theory is itself thought alone 'critical' yet above criticism of its own propaganda and polemic. The role of critical theory is to be critical: offering, unrelieved, no solutions of its own, as if, magically, it is 'out of the game': godlike and untested, like some botched religious absolute, intellectually arrogant, and one sided to boot, telling exactly only one quarter of an entirely different and massively suppressed story, (it is always Marxist/feminist), and colossally ignorant of any other literature, procedure or approach. An intellectually dishonest discipline that itself brooks no discipline: a totally phony intellectual pursuit of no value whatever. As it rarely suffers outside criticism of itself. It is decidedly non-reflexive..

50 years of its unceasing, moronic diatribe of complaint against the Free World has seen the European indigenous peoples brought to the brink of outright economic and population collapse. Now is the time of reckoning. New Zealand alone has directly suffered the loss of 2.3 Trillion dollars because of their ideological meddling: an economic crime of seditious and terrorist proportions. Other and larger losses are slightly less directly attributable to Marxist Feminism as we shall see. Nevertheless a major cause of our economic collapse is due to the overwhelming influence and intellectual sabotage of these two malign philosophies.

 


PHILLIP JOHN O'SULLIVAN

 


New Amazon Kindle ebook: Click on Book Image to view

 


Phillips First Masculist Book

First book in the DEFEAT FEMINIST Series by Phillip John O'Sullivan

 


Masculist or masculinism? What is it?

Well, women have a 'politically aware gender consciousness' which collectively speaks for them. That 'politically aware gender consciousness' that claims to speak for all women is called feminism.

What do men have? Until recently, very little.

 


Search a big library like my Massey University library system where Phillip O'Sullivan found over 403,300 entries for 'feminist' texts by over 300,000 female writers and academics. While only two books by one male author Dr Warren Farrell featured under the 'masculist' term or label. This label should really become to mean something to men..

 


His book 'The Myth of Male power' I can recommend: it is full of useful masculist facts. However, his interpretations and 'solutions', cannot be masculist ones but feminist in flavour.

Still, we have a big fight on our hands and a long way to go.  Though it is growing. Join the fight now before it becomes fashionable.

Support men as MEN. We can destroy feminism first by killing its effect on our own minds. Read mind food that performs that function best. This book is a GREAT start to that. It contains some thoroughly shocking ideas that only angry men will get.

 


Which is where the DEFEAT FEMINIST arguments Series comes in. This series provides the a fully fledged masculist politically aware gender consciousness point of view.

. Because real male rights placed back into gender politics can create arguments supportive of men friendly policy and therefore funding, support and finances for mens health and other initiatives.

Men must learn to talk this masculist language of policy, for the language of politics is policy. And men friendly policy depends on good and powerful arguments.

 


Feminism is a system of guilt very akin to the old Catholic church, or the hypocrisies of Victorian life, or of Mao's pointless 'cultural revolution' with it's little red book waving women cadres chanting fanatically. Only this time the common or garden variety of popular feminism functions as a 'little purple book'. Only that the chanting remains inane and simplistic and just as pointless.'Equal pay for equal work' which sounds Ok until you add 'equal conditions'- for mens conditions are often far different; like deep underground, far out to see, longer hours, night time, dark or cold or stormy or dangerously unequal conditions (See Dr Warren Farrell for similar answers) 'girls can do anything' (except impregnate a man, or another woman) or the infamous lie we answer here- 'rape is about power'.

 


Ask This

If Rape is about an 'all powerful patriarchy' why do men go to jail for it?

If Rape were about power why are so many men falsely accused of it? Matriarchy has all the power when it comes to child custody, length of life and unequal sentencing for similar crimes; why not too with rape?

This book is one mans answer on one issue long thought under the complete control of the female feminist matriarchy: RAPE

Whereby our false accusers dared to call all men 'rapists' (Susan Brownmiller: "Against Our Will") Really ninety percent of all 'real' 'rapes' are caused by serial rapists-are rare-and most men find them repugnant, inadequate or perverse. Not at all characteristic of men as a whole; so feminisms accusations, characterising all men as 'rapists' is entirely false, inaccurate and utterly a lie. On the other side are serial false accusers- hysterical women (feminisms own essentialism) who criminally accuse men for attention, drama and POWER! False accusation is about power- not rape itself. Rape itself is about powerlessness; done by powerless morons who are enticed by 'slutty dressers'(so much for the advice of feminism; Feminism NEEDS and creates 'rapists'- by their advice; in order to keep the funding flow) Feminism creates more rape for money. Feminism is therefore a form of prostitution endangering women, selling the 'poor innocent individual woman' (who is neither poor nor innocent) for the 'greater good' of the feminist cause- from which they draw their pointless incomes. They do it for money. Feminism is ideological prostitution and pimping young females to recruit attractive new lesbians.In rivalry to men. Who are promising marriage and children for the future good of the entire culture. Thus feminism is an enemy of the state, nation or people- in the long run. At some point feminism must end. Or society is over; we shall have no country worth preserving.

This volume is a MASCULIST attack on such bad-mouthing rapist ms- representations in feminist media.

Are all men really all out rapist fiends as depicted by feminism?

And is the only solution to become a wimpy new age 'guy'.

Think of what a 'guy' is, a dupe. a dope with his clothes off. We go way beyond Sommers or Farrell.

A guy who thinks sex is 'have you done it yet'- this book will make your hair stand on end as it too explores just the beginnings of what real male sexuality could be like...

The political conclusion to this book also could shock you.

 


It is nothing less than the reality based claim of men to power in the public sphere, and thus fully deserving of public respect, privileges and honours

 


Are men only interested in sex, violence, war, destruction and hatred. As feminism holds. Find out here.

Are men only male chauvinism bigots bent on dominating power to overcome women and rape them?

All of these images of men are given out by feminism.

Is there any truth to those feminist views of men? Entirely new views and arguments as powerful as anything on this website

Feminism dies an awful death before your eyes in this EBOOK

 


 

 


 Masco-33dPhillip John O'SullivanTitle: 33RD DEGREE : Murder. Coloured Oil Pastel Drawing on Archival CardDimension: 290mm X 300mmPrice: $2450

 


 

 


 

Answering Overpopulation Myths

 


Overpopulation? you say? Is that a problem. Like seven billion persons standing shoulder to shoulder in a medium sized county in Florida? How about a future 15 Billion standing all packed in shoulder to shoulder; standing in one of the largest counties in florida; with several other large counties in Florida empty around them, plus all the medium sized ones and all the small counties in Florida too. All empty in Florida except for one of the largest counties.. And all the rest of Texas, California and Montana etc all of it empty of any human life whatever. The entire United States empty apart from one large county in Florida which is as crowded as, but highly significant and symbolic. Canada empty too, and South America, that's empty. The Caribbean, Europe, Alaska, Russia, China Empty, India and all of Africa and Asia. All just so bleak and empty. Is the world really overcrowded, or just one large county in Florida? .Now move to the largest county in Florida crowded with up to twenty Billions of Humans. Now we are in the year 2050 or so and we have scores of large, medium and small counties in Florida to Go. So is the world really overcrowded? Obviously not. We have heaps of room to move. We make arable land. We have a right to be here. We obviously do not actually dominate the planet; we are thousands and thousands of years away from doing that. There is plenty of room for all the plants and animals to live with us in harmony.

What lie is that with all the rest of the world empty. So really it is an argument about a supposed 'shortage' of arable land. Malthus was entirely wrong theoretically: he postulated that human growth would outrun food growth. Yet food, all food, red-meat, fish, seafood, biomas,dairy, sheep, or green vegetables or fruit is grown biologically on the same seed and egg basis as is humanity. Therefore there is no theoretical difference whatever; they both grow on a moderated geometric potentiating basis; moderated by natural death and attrition. Food grows by seed and egg (when one considers the seed in green food to be the actual seed, and the womb-egg to be the soil.)

 


So where does arable land come from: pray tell me I really want to know. It comes from out of our bums.

 


Each person shits out more than enough tonnage of night soil; properly utilized, over their lifetime to cater for more than enough arable land to support themselves and many others. Shitting is something we cannot help doing. The same goes for skin scurf, sweat, tears, sex fluids, other liquids (ie piss) and other waste products of the human body. Mixed with, hay, stubble, dust, clay, paper, food scraps, corpses, and other wastes huge quantities of arable land can be created. Physical calculations to come.

 


NOTES

 


...............................................

Constraining elements in Malthus.

 


Bodyweight-menses young-famine active.

Pregnancy

Death

Age

Fertility

gestation

Contraception

6 possible 4 as sign of contraception rythmn etc interruptus

Verticality... of Cities = tall buildings

Maths verticality impossible because babies take longer than one second gestation: at upper levels of stellar acceleration

space signals real feedbackloop

technology

science of food artificial food.

morality/marriage/litter 54/twins triplets

war nuclear disaster others disease epidemics,

results of zero- moribund + collapse=

 


Here's what we do know: there are 300 million Americans. In 1996, the EPA estimated that 72% of us are served by America's 16,000+ publicly-owned sewage treatment plants. Assuming that number is still accurate, that's 216 million people today. Those of you who are good at math have already figured out where this is headed: 216 million people, 108 million pounds -- a daily per-capita of a half-pound of cable laid.

 


But that's an educated guess. Because, as it turns out, there are no definitive figures. In his book Nanomedicine, Dr. Robert A. Freitas Jr. cites three studies in putting his daily figure at 100-200 grams -- that is, .22 to .44 pounds a day. A 1992 study in Gastroenterology found an average of 106 grams a day among 220 UK residents, but with the caveat that "data from other populations of the world show average stool weight to vary from 72 to 470 g/day." The Merck Manual says that Westerners grunt out 100-300 grams a day. But in the very next breath, Merck says that "generally, stool amount > 300 g/day is considered diarrhea" -- which is ridiculous, because who defines diarrhea by weight? A two-pound bowl-curler isn't diarrhea because it tips some arbitrary scale; nor is a sputtering blurt of rancid curry ambiguous until some formal weigh-in.

Source:

http://www.poopreport.com/Intellectual/h...

 


    8000 kg (7665kg) eight metric tonnes almost enough to fertilize plus piss/urine clay, sand, wastes etc to create compost into the body itself atlevels commensurate with more than subsistent life survival and support. Men create their own arable land. Therefore there is absolutely NO overpopulation problem ever. Until completely biological ones kick in; which could happen ten thousand years from now maybe.

 


    RECORDED human history is only six thousand years old so who cares today what was in the Daily papers, or on the mid morning news, during Adam or Eves time?

 


Nobody.

 


Crisis over.

 


................................................

 


There is no problem at all then about shortage of 'arable land'; humans create it; the more humans there are the more sustainable life becomes. And the more for birds, cats, dogs, plants and other lifeforms to grow.

 


Something similar with pollution; it was the western low-birth rate nations that did most of the pollution. Later it was exported to other countries yet continued to receive most of the worlds exports as imports of luxury stuff while the rest wallowed in poverty. The rich low birthrate countries were selfish and caused directly and indirectly most all of the worlds industrial pollution's. Generally the high birthrate nations polluted little, and especially less as long as the so called 'first-world' left them alone. So no children actually means high pollution, whereas children means natural family life and little or no pollution as food production; which causes very little pollution becomes a priority in feeding families. People do not cause pollution; machines do.

 


The marxist- feminist ideology has worked upon us to our total biological loss. People have deliberately organized an eradication of our cultural group and ethnic pride. While visibly retaining exactly what is condemned in others for their home state of Zionist hegemony and sovereign rulership over the world order. This New World Order has the ambition to dominate materialistically and matrilineally from out of a Communist/Capitalist female dominance or matrilineal system based geographically at the centre of boss in a wheel where Europe, Asia and Africa roll along according to their collective central will and Matriarchal ideology. It is time to ditch this malign miserable and parasitical ideology.; it engenders nothing. Feminist-fascism is barren. A matrimonial apparatus we must divorce ourselves from.

Marxist Feminism is practicing its own brand of ethnic cleansing in slow demographic notions, hoping we do not notice; from out of the Frankfurt school of politically correct ideology, academic hegemony and intellectual consciousness. Young men, in despair at the role, yes, the role, that intellectual feminism assigns them: mute and agreeable sex subjects, are marked down by women teachers as shown in many reaserch results and papers, undercutting what residual dignity they have to the frequent point of suicide. Yes, feminism is LITERALLY KILLING our young men. Phillip O'Sullivan the artist, writer, webmaster and videographer does notice and loudly declares our cultural rights and freedoms. Both as men and human beings. Feminism murders all life not just that of babies. It is our intent to restore our world and the best political environment for sustaining European culture: we must do demographically what other indigenous peoples have themselves the right to do: BREED, in order to prosper and grow culturally and economically.

 


Date: 2013 Private Collection.

Buy Now: artpos@ymail Paypal TM

 


Just contact : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Lifetime Earnings

 


This loss arises from the loss of the 'lifetime earnings' from the economic activity of the 400,000 aborted in New Zealand alone: almost ten percent of the entire country. Had they lived their lifetime earnings would have sustained our economy at the then current level until now, with every likelihood of continuing. These are not people we could not ever have had, these are living humans we could have had and did not.

Lifetime earnings on average are 3 to 4 million each over a forty or fifty year working life. Plus these earnings are in the cause of much more value in terms of goods produced in New Zealand since no one pays someone 40k just to produce 40k worth of goods: as there is no point in that, as there is no increase. So people are paid somewhat less than the total value of what they produce. That increase is relative to the extra costs and risks involved (something Karl Marx never accounts for). So the $2.3 Trillion in NZ alone is somewhat much more than that: maybe five times that; say, $10.15 Trillion dollars over the next fifty years. Now do you see how the loan of a mere .035 Trillion (35 Billion) that Mr Key bought his way into office with at the hands of the big hidden banksters who-really-run-the-world goes nowhere near being able to supplement or replace that massive loss. Furthermore when other population depredations are added in, like contraceived losses or absences: that massive figure is ten times greater still. At a loss of $101.5 Trillion dollars in NZ alone over the next fifty years. In other words we have halved our potential income from general economic activity over the next fifty years, by means of our lustful lifestyles, hardly a wise option to go on with. New Zealand was always known as the 'easy' country: where our women folk opened their legs too readily: masculists will necessarily have to act in closing them. Only reproductive lifestyles will return us to economic viability. Anything else is cultural, economic and race suicide. Do not leave your brains at the door, reject murder as a way of life, it cannot bring life but only death. Such desperation amoung men of sense may grow so that violent coups, putsches, right wing revolutions may occur. These are desperate times. Men are fed up with the lies and the death bringing consciousness of Feminism. Surgical operations incise the gangrene of such death: in order to save the whole. This is my political prophecy and legacy.

 


Phillip John O'Sullivan

Title: Diagram of Collapse. Coloured Oil Pastel Drawing on Archival Card

Dimension: 290mm X 300mm

Price: $1450

 


Marxist Feminism is performing its own brand of ethnic cleansing in slow demographic notions, hoping we do not notice. Phillip O'Sullivan the artist, writer, webmaster and videographer does notice and loudly declares our cultural rights and freedoms. Both as men and human beings. It is our intent to restore our world and the best political environment for sustaining European culture: we must do demographically what other indigenous peoples have themselves the right to do: in order to prosper and grow culturally and economically. Limit the chaos of open slather: tolerate nothing that is not conducive to a sound and disciplined society and state.

 


Date: 2013 Artists Private Collection.

Buy Now: artpos@ymail Paypal TM

 


Just contact : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 


See other website also, this in a different, quieter, mode at www.philliposullivan.co.nz

 


Immigration As Urban Myth

 


Immigration barely scratches that surface and contributes unique problems of its own. Such as competition for houses driving up prices. Cultural assimilation and language confusions. Someone competing immediately with you for jobs (driving down wages) and or opening up next to you (driving down the price you can sell at), important if you are in business. Religious conflicts and tension too must increase in the future. Fundamentalism too may increase. This is not what we want in liberal New Zealand surely?

 


No wonder New Zealanders are heading for an ever deeper recession with no end in sight. Austerity for many is already here but Labour is no answer to the problem, as it is they who largely caused it by the mechanism above. Make no mistake these are the predominant means by which we have socially engineered our own destruction. Have your pleasures by all means, just remember it may have cost you your future career, salary, job, house and mode of living. Slavery awaits you!

Literally.

 


Unless we do everything this site recommends: so read on.Things have worked upon us to our detriment. People have deliberately organized an eradication of our cultural group and ethnic pride

 


Email.. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

What is Masculist Art & Theory?

 


Phillip John O'Sullivan

Title: Diagram of Collapse II: Then and Now the future....

Coloured Oil Pastel Drawing on Archival Card

Dimension: 290mm X 300mm

Price: $1450

 


PHILLIP JOHN O'SULLIVAN

 


New Amazon Kindle ebook: Click on Book Image to view

 


Phillips First Masculist Book

First book in the DEFEAT FEMINIST Series by Phillip John O'Sullivan

 


Masculist or masculinism? What is it?

Well, women have a 'politically aware gender consciousness' which collectively speaks for them. That 'politically aware gender consciousness' that claims to speak for all women is called feminism.

What do men have? Until recently, very little.

 


Search a big library like my Massey University library system where Phillip O'Sullivan found over 403,300 entries for 'feminist' texts by over 300,000 female writers and academics. While only two books by one male author Dr Warren Farrell featured under the 'masculist' term or label. This label should really become to mean something to men..

 


His book 'The Myth of Male power' I can recommend: it is full of useful masculist facts. However, his interpretations and 'solutions', cannot be masculist ones but feminist in flavour.

Still, we have a big fight on our hands and a long way to go.  Though it is growing. Join the fight now before it becomes fashionable.

Support men as MEN. We can destroy feminism first by killing its effect on our own minds. Read mind food that performs that function best. This book is a GREAT start to that. It contains some thoroughly shocking ideas that only angry men will get.

 


Which is where the DEFEAT FEMINIST arguments Series comes in. This series provides the a fully fledged masculist politically aware gender consciousness point of view.

. Because real male rights placed back into gender politics can create arguments supportive of men friendly policy and therefore funding, support and finances for mens health and other initiatives.

Men must learn to talk this masculist language of policy, for the language of politics is policy. And men friendly policy depends on good and powerful arguments.

 


Feminism is a system of guilt very akin to the old Catholic church, or the hypocrisies of Victorian life, or of Mao's pointless 'cultural revolution' with it's little red book waving women cadres chanting fanatically. Only this time the common or garden variety of popular feminism functions as a 'little purple book'. Only that the chanting remains inane and simplistic and just as pointless.'Equal pay for equal work' which sounds Ok until you add 'equal conditions'- for mens conditions are often far different; like deep underground, far out to see, longer hours, night time, dark or cold or stormy or dangerously unequal conditions (See Dr Warren Farrell for similar answers) 'girls can do anything' (except impregnate a man, or another woman) or the infamous lie we answer here- 'rape is about power'.

 


Ask This

If Rape is about an 'all powerful patriarchy' why do men go to jail for it?

If Rape were about power why are so many men falsely accused of it? Matriarchy has all the power when it comes to child custody, length of life and unequal sentencing for similar crimes; why not too with rape?

This book is one mans answer on one issue long thought under the complete control of the female feminist matriarchy: RAPE

Whereby our false accusers dared to call all men 'rapists' (Susan Brownmiller: "Against Our Will")

This volume is a MASCULIST attack on such bad-mouthing rapist ms- representations in feminist media.

Are all men really all out rapist fiends as depicted by feminism?

And is the only solution to become a wimpy new age 'guy'.

Think of what a 'guy' is, a dupe. a dope with his clothes off. We go way beyond Sommers or Farrell.

A guy who thinks sex is 'have you done it yet'- this book will make your hair stand on end as it too explores just the beginnings of what real male sexuality could be like...

The political conclusion to this book also could shock you.

 


It is nothing less than the reality based claim of men to power in the public sphere, and thus fully deserving of public respect, privileges and honours

 


Are men only interested in sex, violence, war, destruction and hatred. As feminism holds. Find out here.

Are men only male chauvinism bigots bent on dominating power to overcome women and rape them?

All of these images of men are given out by feminism.

Is there any truth to those feminist views of men? Entirely new views and arguments as powerful as anything on this website

Feminism dies an awful death before your eyes in this EBOOK

1) First stage masculism was the mens movement. 1972 -1983 Many of these men however were closet pro-feminists.

2) Second stage Masculist movements began some consciousness raising exercises in the eighties, but these too were modeled on the lines of a more manipulative PUA/NLP and para-quasi-proto feminist models. Nor were they exactly pro-masculist in outlook, as that need was not yet fully appreciated or apparent. A very deceitful and frustrating time. Webmaster here wrote a mens manifesto toward the end.

3) Stage three began in the 21st century as a truly masculist pro-men mens rights movement: somewhat characterised by a victim mindset echoing feminist victimology. As in children need fathers appeals. Webmaster here wrote a Declaration of Mens Rights in 2003. So far we have lost nearly all battles.

4) From approximately now to 2018: Radically pro-masculist movement finally attacks and questions feminism and matriarchy outright as probably the greatest evil of civilization. Especially for Western European society. Devoted to the legal, political and social destruction of feminist ideology and marxist political correctness; in the name of freedom and liberty. Many academics, bloggers and writers on board. Many Professors also. This analysis still unfolds. Its aim is to destroy utterly the oppressive Matriarchal nanny state and its genocidal and anti-democratic terror.

5) Extreme pro-masculist in the future will disallow no strategy or tactical means to promote an absolutely necessary new patriarchy; circa 2020-2025

Masculist Art and Theory is to outline strategies, methods and analysis for the obliteration of all the evils of Matriarchy and to promote the positive benefits of an exclusive capitalist Patriarchy having absolute sway over human destiny. Previous patriarchies were unknowing and instinctive/intuitive models: feminism has defined better the reason for a full-on, knowing, knowledgeable and sophisticatedly nuanced PATRIARCHY that is absolutely sure of its necessity and of its masculist character. Our deepest enemy is death: we bring Fatherhood and Life to society and civilization; fighting statistical genocide that is made as if normalized within feminism; that state apparatus paradigm that is the dominant ideology of our time; the Matriarchal Hegemony. It is a war against a culture of death we must win in order to survive at all. Thanatos is dead: long live Life!

What do you think?

Send us feedback!