Feminism Rapes Men's Consciousness

Sick  of fighting unjustified rearguard small outbreak fires again and again?  Miss getting at the root of the big blaze of our fierce accusers? To  put it out once and for all- for that we need theory. Masculist theory is the getting at the root of their fiery blaze. Radix means root- so what is needed is something Radical.

Radically  beyond the already excellent Professor Christina Hoff Sommers and Dr  Warren Farrell- for whom we can thank for their wonderful books “Who  Stole Feminism” (Sommers) and “The Myth of Male Power” (Farrell) which  both contain data and facts as ammunition in our fight against an  alienating divisive feminism. Their facts, analysis and descriptions of  the situation are excellent. However the need for solutions and strategies, ways to combat false statistics,  false interpretations and misguided feminist policy are mostly lacking within their writings. Such as provided seem tame compared to the fierce  claims, demands and  often false 'rights' (always without responsibilities) promoted by feminism exclusively for elite academic white women.

Masculist theory is an attempt to get at useful depths, meanings and outcomes for all men everywhere.
Radical masculist theory dispenses with feminist thinking entirely- we do not trust it.
Its  facts are ‘cherry picked’-you know what that is? It means they select  the very few isolated minority examples from a hundred question survey;  highlight ten in a report, all of these ten favour the case they want to make; then out of the report further highlight just the two very ‘best’ of all for their case presented in a press  release- this is what goes out to all the media. A simple communist like  propaganda exercise. Only this time all men suffer. We intend to ease, halt and reverse that suffering.

Phillip O'Sullivan

Cabinet of Culture  2014

Available Saatchi Art Com

Naturally  the best data for any men's case is kept out of view in the seldom  seen, requested or viewed original full survey results. This is the  entirety of feminist data collecting methodology in a nutshell. Needless  to say all this is in women's  control. Thus all feminist data sources, information, surveys etc are  completely bogus. None are to be trusted. No men are included except by  accident. Thus all feminist data is skewed by over fifty percent from  the outset. As it simply fails to ask the men. A comical oversight that  renders almost all feminist philosophy illegitimate, poorly based and  with a fragile grasp on reality. Hence the hysteria, paranoia and  emotion driven  campaigns of feminism. Formed into institutions and social structures  its seeming great power is mostly smoke and mirrors. It is merely institutionalized bigotry, discrimination and prejudice against men. Feminism is a hate crime; pure and simple.
Women have supposed feminism to speak for all or some of them. Yet they too lack an all encompassing  attempt at a philosophy of a female gender. There is an attempt by  Professor Judith Butler of Columbia University to convey notions playing with  the idea of gender as a whole, where she says ‘gender is performative';  but this theatrical interpretation fails when we see, in contrast to  her theatrical 'performativity', that it is reified sexuality that is  ‘performative’ for we mark off the very body items that perform the  sexuality; ie ‘fisting’, ‘anal fisting’, ‘anal ”vaginal’, ‘full frontal’  'clitoral' 'phallic' 'caressing' 'sensuality' 'stroking' 'lingering',  'fingering ' 'tongue kiss' and so on.
Contrary to Butler then I can say gender is fixed in by the following definition; ’gender is that which engenders the next generation’. On that rock of course  the entirety of feminism, let alone Butler, completely founders. For  feminism like the personal inconsequentiality of its speakers, talkers  and otherwise practitioners has  no time consciousness, no sense of future responsibility like men have  for they never ask what is the long term bulk result of their temporary social  experiment. It is a mere movement  like Greenpeace: necessarily parasitic on the continued success of the  economics of both, what they call 'patriarchy', and of the much maligned  capitalism. Feminism is not an all-encompassing political system, it  cannot be, for it has no wider social vision nor a sense of future, nor  an economic system of its own; it is necessarily parasitic on both its  false targets. Feminism is a parasite of its favourite knocking boy; 'patriarchy': and  of capitalism. That it could enforce its tyrannical will on men  highlights its truer dreadful roots in a matriarchal  super-owner-capitalism of usury and debt slavery. Its confluence with  Zionism is complete. Feminism is Zionism in drag. The slavery of all men  is its goal. The ultimate expression of power; the real desire, to rule  the world.








Masculist Book recommendations

These are the books this whole site references for its authority
Everything stated here is backed up by one or other of books like these.
However I consider their 'interpretations' weak and their recommendations for ACTION- in the light of population, economic, political and massive government funding biases to be highly regretable at best. For instance their recommendations are small in scale or dismissively 'ironic' as if we were talking about some tiny 'bad joke' incident.
The ramifications as to the survival of Western Civilization is really what at stake- and thus the deeper ironies run in precisely the opposite direction; how will feminism survive if it successfully destroys the so called capitalist/patriarchy/deep state structures on which it so seriously depends?





What do you think?

Send us feedback!