Coming Out Masculist 2013

 

The State of Play Then.

Manifesto here

8% of entire World Market

Suppression

 

See Further

The sick, irrational men, those who attempt to defend themselves against their disgustingness, when they see SCUM barrelling down on them, will cling in terror to Big Mama with her Big Bouncy Boobies, but Boobies won't protect them against SCUM; Big Mama will be clinging to Big Daddy, who will be in the corner shitting in his forceful, dynamic pants. Men who are rational, however, won't kick or struggle or raise a distressing fuss, but will just sit back, relax, enjoy the show and ride the waves to their demise.

http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html

 


Copyright © 2012 Phillip O’Sullivan

All rights reserved.

ISBN:9781520974057

ISBN-13:

 

DEDICATION

 

 

To My Father
Maurice Joseph O’Sullivan.

 

 

Introduction 

 

This ebook is an introduction to the intended possibility for male rights as equal to and exactly equivalent to that for women allowed for by gender. It was first produced on the website all4men.org (on the wayback machine) back in 2002. This version is still being updated and we welcome any comments suggesting any such updates or additions in the comment/review section for this book.
- Phillip O'Sullivan 2017

 

The first International mens conference ever was held in 2012 and featured Dr Warren Farrell and Dr Christina Hoff Sommers.

 

 

 Beyond Dr Warren Farrell's "The Myth of Male Power" & Dr Christina Hoff Sommers "Who Stole Feminism?" Comes a book with stronger interpretations of the male condition. Dr's Sommers and Farrell were once feminists. O'Sullivan makes no apology; he is no feminist. His views are powerful because they are in the context of politics, policy and economic conditions, his solutions deeper & more radical. The good ecademics are writing purely from the point of personal or philosophical ethics and consequences. Feminism is having far bigger effects than that.

 

 

 Men have forgotten what it was like to live in a world without feminism. Now it is our everyday reality. Men once had dignity, honour and respect. Now men are treated as criminals under constant suspicion. Feminised ‘equality’ hurts men. All the advantages seem to apply to women; none to men. Is this fair? Is this feminist 'equality' actually not equal? So how do we react? Are feminists trying to make men feel bad all the time? For being male? Political victories in media, courts and politics as manipulated by elite feminists. Who are they to tell us these things? Would it not be better to hear this from a man,-supposing this was so in any way? Do women have the right to rule our masculine emotional and political lives? Doesn't this put stress on our lives? Lives that are difficult enough already. We men discovered under this unfair criticism. Our need of male loyalty. Masculine identity can be enhanced. Why not a conscientious empowerment for men, as men, without the guilt trip burden? How could anyone object? With confidence, and a happier dynamic toward men's lives, it can enrich and generate success in life. We then have a new masculist motivation to exert our very best for those we love. Why need any woman to feel threatened by that? In this book, feminism's pointless accusations against demonised men are positively defeated. Mens increased consciousness lights an awakened awareness in cultural success. Feminism creates fear of this male gender confidence; in our male strength of character. Male gendered people empowered can play a greater part in society. A mentally defeated matriarchy- the nanny state- then no longer drags down our inner confidence. We will win. We need male freedom; our birthright as men. As you will find out in this book. The probability that feminism is never true for men. It can be challenged at every point successfully by intelligent men. This will give you the new male edge in matriarchal ideology. Your male trust in the politically aware process of male gender consciousness is our strength. Extending outward to a growing network of confident masculine men. Confidence comes free. If feminism has ever filled you with fear; knowing what this book contains may explode your life. Never feel afraid of people, or the postmodern world ever again. The author once felt as you do now. After coming out masculinist; seeing it as a viable defense of the entire male gender. To which we men all belong. Fake women cannot stand this.. Greater confidence with knowing it is OK to be male. This is how we should be. Free of double-guessing social situations. Free to be men again. Untroubled confidence in oneself. Only around seventeen percent are  feminists anyway. A relaxed mind can discern ones real friends better. This equals confidence to do anything and win success. Be proud of the male gender. Being a man is no crime. You are one yourself. Men are everywhere. Instead of working out at the gym alone- and still afraid of harsh feminists? Work out at the mind gym reading this postmodern manist book.

 

We begin by examining the possibilities of a sketch template, like a working model as demonstration of a 'Mens Manifesto' to which you are invited to contribute on the reviews and comments page at Amazon. Thank you.


Everywhere in the Post - Modern World men are oppressed, men are disadvantaged by an opposing gender based prejudice.

 

This document seeks a beginning to redress that imbalance.

 

Preliminary draft:

 

  1. Men have the right to a length of life equal to that of women. Expenditure on Womens health can be over seven times that spent on men. No wonder women live longer. Men should demand the equivalent expenditure AND longevity outcome: BIOLOGY IS NOT DESTINY
    Many dangerous things flow from this urgent disparity. Women neglect it at their peril. Vote power built upon it legitimizes womens rule via its deadly difference more and more until the danger is so apparent to all a revolution takes place: neither sought nor desired. A revolution of the right over wrong.

 

 

 

  1. Men have the Right to equal outcomes at all levels before the Law. Men have the right to equal custody outcomes: 50/50 in overall cases. The ten worst Judges historically in each category to have instant dismissal. All mens rights issues will be looked at. Retrospectively going back at least as far as the Treaty of Waitangi. As established by precedent. For example: Men can sue women for murdering their child.. Men can prosecute women for nymphomania- the exact female equivalent as serial rape for instance: as women are NOT to be supposed more moral or virtuous than men. (We can call that the 'sugar and spice syndrome') .This personal is the political.

 

 

 

  1. Men have the right to be treated fairly in the media, libraries, books and TV, video, DVD and the movies..Misandry is a hate crime. Sexism itself has become sexist. An injustice perpetrated on men exclusively. Are their no crimes that women do exclusively? Mens rights say there are. Security arms of Government could be employed on International arrest and apprehension orders to bring retrospective female criminals to face a court of law and suitable punishment.

 

 

 

  1. Men have the right to exactly 50% of the electorate. Biology is not destiny. Otherwise Democracy itself is under threat by the 49%/51% imbalance as an oppressive mechanism designed to suppress mens rights. It is imperative that we correct this for whatever remains of Democracy at all.
    Men should be able to vote in a dead brothers place for two to three elections more to right this balance. Otherwise democracy becomes merely womens government and will lose all respect from men.

 

 

  1. Men have the right to have exactly as much money spent on mens ordinary health as that of women or even an increased proportion until mens longevity matches that of women. Health issues and true Democracy are inextricable linked through lifestyle and resulting length of life- it is the collective and retrospective legal responsibility of Health Authorities and of Health officials to work assiduously and effectively to correct expenditure and outcome results in regard to mens health at all stages of life. Failure to do so- or to have done so will result in prosecution and liability for all or any male deaths/or illnesses and outbreaks under their prior jurisdiction.

 

 

 

  1. Men have the right to fight for their country only in so far as women do so also: or surrender commensurate rights.

Mens rights recognize the greater role men play in dirty, dangerous and life threatening occupations. Such as fire services and rescue teams. That very few women do so after thirty years of feminism only reinforces this provision. Men do all the real shit jobs still. We have the right that men so endangered be compensated by society.

Women influence the future through the children. Their vote is in their bodies.
 Men influence the future only through the vote.
Government is the worlds worst product. You have to buy it, you cannot return it. If you complain you cannot sue it and win. They may not even deliver it to you. Men pay for it yet are always at the end of the queue on receipt of it. In the end having exhausted you the government hopes you die ealy so they can get on with their real interest; paying out your sweat on women.
It is time for men to change this entirely. The current President is just the beginning. The media and universities are not our friends. Do not make any bequests to them. Spend your money on causes that favour men well before men typically in your family die. Be charitable to all men. Withhold wealth from women and feminism in particular. Stop supporting businesses that corrupt or support the already too wealthy women's estate. Support mens colleges of education exclusively.

 

 

  1. Men have the right not to be at all vilified for their gender. Men have the right to form a mens anti-defamation league.

Men have the right not to listen to women on mens issues. Gossip, presumption and scandal mongering are equivalent to malicious prosecution first off with no prior case necessary. that should be made a crime under universal law protecting men's rights.

 

 

 

  1. Men have a right to the highest honours. Men have the right to form exclusive men only organizations. Men have the right to take class action suits against feminists for historical grievances. And to demand these men hating females be permanently banned from any government employment for the rest of their unnatural lives.

 

 

 

  1. Men have the right to be heard and heeded. Men have the right to create political forums to discuss their own special and unique interests.

 

 

 

  1. Men have rights. Men are the largest minority on earth. We are everywhere. Men can do anything. Add to this concept by writing to Mens Rights Preliminary Draft

 

 

 

Draughts contributing further ideas on mens rights will be published in accordance with the spirit expressed here. Financial contributions are also welcome for our campaign. We demand equity and Justice for all men everywhere. Support the cause of freedom

Copyright © 2002 Phillip John O'Sullivan.

All rights reserved

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Longevity

 

 

 

  1. Men have the right to a length of life equal to that of women. Expenditure on Womens health can be over seven times that spent on men. No wonder women live longer. Men should demand the equivalent expenditure AND longevity outcome: BIOLOGY IS NOT DESTINY Why might men accept this as fair?

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

Funding for health and medical ministries must be equally targetted toward men.

Where can this happen? Wealthy nations must reapportion their health expenditure so that men receive exactly half of it. Or that, accounting for men having fallen behind should receive exactly that proportionately extra. Do they though? One doubts it. Another case of inequality that runs against men.

How is thinking this empowering? Well we are not dragged down by unwarranted artificial guilt. We do not want anyone to feel guilty although feminism for its victories seems to trade in it.

 

 

How are we do do this?

Protest marches and organizing male gender consciousness raising groups must be equally funded by governments. Universities too should lead the charge in correcting what is so clearly a vast disparity. Their failure to do so now erodes their standing as intellectual sources of authority in the future.

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view. Because our situation as men is far from what feminists have been saying. Feminism is not being fair to men. Not one feminist book says even one good unqualified thing about men. So how then can 'Feminism be for Everyone' as some feminists say? If that were true why are men differing in the main from that view. Only sell-out male gender 'traitors' or know-nothings share their view- usually on specious and/or very shallow premises like Micheal Kimmel. Comparing him to Dr Warren Farrell would be like comparing an old single brick to a towering gleaming new skyscraper in terms of profundity of thought.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 equal Outcomes

 

 

  1. Men have the Right to equal outcomes at all levels before the Law. Men have the right to equal custody outcomes: 50/50 in overall cases. The ten worst Judges historically in each category to have instant dismissal. Ten worst in all other catergories too; like lawyers, activists, writers, academics and so on. Because violations of human rights supercedes all other priviliges and rights. None can hide behind immunities of whatever sort. All mens rights issues will be looked at. Retrospectively going back at least as far as the Treaty of Waitangi. As established by precedent. This is 150 years sisters! For example: Men can sue women for murdering their child. Men can prosecute women for nymphomania- the exact female equivalent as serial rape for instance: as women are NOT to be supposed more moral or virtuous than men. (We can call that the 'sugar and spice syndrome') .  In all independent studies- the literature is now full of them; independent mean not 'feminist' ones. Like getting the axe sharpeners to verbally attest to the sharpness of their axes in order to obtain future work (funding) for the ongoing sharpening of the axes. The personal now is our political. Equity is now our issue free of biased media bigotry.

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

Men who have lost access to children in whatever capacity; it must be re-established to be a crime that men-as-men are supposed more evil than are women. Plenty of anecdotal evidence online shows this.

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

The divorce rates are now so painfully high that social collapse of marriage could bring total destruction of our culture. This proves not that capitalism has failed; only that social engineering and the feminist 'transformative' narrative has failed. We must immediately prioritize the repair of these social conditions. Even if it means a sharp return to 'old fashioned values' as a stop-rot/gap measure. Fundamentalism must return at least for a time.

 Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

Recognize that feminism has failed outright; it has brought untold misery to millions. Threats of total collapse and breakdown to the Western civilization. Do we think something as important as civilization will not respond?

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 Media Representations

 

 

3 . Men have the right to be treated fairly in the media, libraries, books and TV, video, DVD and the movies. Misandry is a hate crime. Sexism itself has become sexist. An injustice perpetrated on men exclusively. Are their no crimes that women do exclusively? Mens rights say there are. In the West since 1972 around ten percent of potential citizens have been aborted yet the same number of immigrants have been imported.  This does not make sense in terms of cultural assimilation.
 Security arms of Government could be employed on International arrest and apprehension orders to bring retrospective female criminals to face a court of law and suitable punishment. Yet currently we only arrest men for gender crimes. Is this fair? 40,000 people have been charged worldwide with thought crime speech code violations; how does this square with freedom of speech on obscenity for instance; surely that is meant to be offensive? Most of these earlier 'violators' would be men. How come? If half the human race does these things then it is normal and thus not a crime. Who has therefore said being a man is the crime; surely only extremist feminists. But not women in general? Only special snowflake laws? To protect melting snowflakes from 'triggering'? Is this what we have come to? Is justice earning any respect by being so petty and yet so extreme? Will this not break down law and order. This must be what socialists want. Destruction to justify killings and wild revolution. A mad enterprise that has to fail in sulking misery. Men are happy creatures by comparison. Let us restore normal to its rightful place. In the centre of our lives.

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Fifty/Fifty Outcomes

 

 

  1. Men have the right to exactly 50% of the electorate. Biology is not destiny. Otherwise Democracy itself is under threat by the 49%/51% imbalance as an oppressive mechanism designed to suppress mens rights. It is imperative that we correct this for whatever remains of Democracy at all.

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.


 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 Men’s Medical Health

 

 

  1. Men have the right to have exactly as much money spent on mens ordinary health as that of women or even an increased proportion until mens longevity matches that of women. Health issues and true Democracy are inextricable linked through lifestyle and resulting length of life- it is the collective and retrospective legal responsibility of Health Authorities and of Health officials to work assiduously and effectively to correct expenditure and outcome results in regard to mens health at all stages of life. Failure to do so- or to have done so will result in prosecution and liability for all or any male deaths/or illnesses and outbreaks under their prior jurisdiction.

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6 Military Men

 

 

  1. Men have the right to fight for their country only in so far as women do so also: or surrender commensurate rights.

Mens rights recognize the greater role men play in dirty, dangerous and life threatening occupations. Such as fire services and rescue teams. That very few women do so after thirty years of feminism only reinforces this provision. Men do all the real shit jobs still. We have the right that men so endangered be compensated by society.

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 male Gender Rights

 

 

  1. Men have the right not to be at all vilified for their gender. Men have the right to form a mens anti-defamation league. Men have the right not to listen to women on mens issues. Gossip, presumption and scandal mongering are equivalent to malicious prosecution first off with no prior case necessary. that should be made a crime under universal law protecting men's rights.

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8 Men’s Legal Rights

 

 

  1. Men have a right to the highest honours for the life threatening risks we take. Men have the right to form exclusive men only organizations. Men have the right to take class action suits against feminists for historical grievances. And to demand these men hating persons be permanently banned from any government employment for the rest of their unnatural lives. Is this too heavy?

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.

 

 

 

 

 

8 Mens Democracy

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Men have the right to be heard and heeded. Men have the right to create political forums to discuss their own special and unique interests. Is a mens caucus allowed?

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need Mens rights? In your view.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 Minority Rights

 

 

  1. Men have rights. Men are the largest minority on earth. We are everywhere. Men can do anything. Add to this concept by writing to Mens Rights Preliminary Draft. Add comments and reviews toward this end in the Amazon website. Can you think of other male rights that may be considered fair and reasonable?

 

Who What Where and How & Why WORKBOOK

 Who can you think of here?

 

What can be done?  What must be done soon, first, now?

 

Where can this happen?

 

 

How are we do do this?

 

 

Why do we need more Mens rights? In your view. To explicitly state or restate them in female equivalent legislation. Isn't that fair and right. Okay then. Have a good day.




 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

Manliness by Harvey Mansfield (2006) Yale Press [2] ISBN 0-300-10664-5


The Myth of Male Power, Dr. Warren Farrell,
 
  

http://www.amazon.com/Myth-Male-Power-Warren-Farrell/dp/0425181448

 

 

Not Guilty: The Case in Defense of Men; David Thomas, William Morrow and Co., Inc., New York, 1993; ISBN 0-688-1024-X

Good Will Toward Men; Jack Kammer, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1994; ISBN 0-312-10471-5

Moral Panic: Biopolitics Rising; John Fekete, Robert Davies Publishing, Montreal- Toronto, 1994: ISBN 1-895854-09-1

The New Men's Studies: A Selected and Annotated Interdisciplinary Bibliography (2nd Edition); Eugene R. August, Libraries Unlimited, Inc., Englewood, CO, 1994: ISBN 1-56308-084-2

A Man's World: How Real Is Male Privilege - And How High Is Its Price?; Ellis Cose, Harper Collins, New York, 1995: ISBN 0-06-017206-1

Why Men Don't Iron: The Real Science of Gender Studies; Anne & Bill Moir, Harper Collins, Hammersmith, London, 1998; ISBN 0-00-257035-1 (Trade Paperback); ISBN 0-00-257048-3 (Hardcover)

The Strong, Sensitive Boy; Ted Zeff, Prana Publishing (May 3, 2010); ISBN 0966074521

The Church Impotent: The Feminization of Christianity; Leon J. Podles, Spence Publishing Co., Dallas, TX, 1999. (The title is a play on the Christian theological terms church militant and church triumphant.)

Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture; Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, 2001; ISBN 0-7735-2272-7

"Feminine" Heterosexual Men: Subverting Heteropatriarchal Sexual Scripts?; Darryl B. Hill, The Journal of Men's Studies, Spring 2006, Men's Studies Press; ISSN 1060-8265

Re-Thinking Men: Heroes, Villains and Victims; Anthony Synnott, Ashgate, 2009; ISBN  978-0754677093

The Second Sexism; David Benatar, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012; ISBN 978-0470674512

Email to the Universe; Robert Anton Wilson, New Falcon Publications, 2008; ISBN 978-1561841943

Sex Differences, Modern Biology and the Unisex Fallacy, Yves Christen

Who Stole Feminism? How Women Have Betrayed Women; Christina Hoff Sommers ISBN 0- 684-80156-6

The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men; Christina Hoff Sommers ISBN 0-684-84956-9

Domestic Violence: The 12 Things You Aren't Supposed to Know by Thomas B. James ISBN 1-59330-122-7

Ceasefire! : Why Women And Men Must Join Forces To Achieve True Equality; Cathy Young ISBN 0-684-83442-1

The Masculine Mystique; Andrew Kimbrell ISBN 0-345-38658-2

 

 

 

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

 

 

At Art School for the second time in my life I thought I knew something of what to expect; having made an adolescent decision earlier to concentrate on non-fiction reading as many men do I was fairly sure to be able to cope intellectually with the academic side of things- previously at Canterbury University School of Fine Art at Ilam. Teachers included Don Peebles, Doris Lusk and Rudi Gopas. I studied art history with Tom Taylor and William Sutton these being my best subjects as they were academic; Modern Art, Renaissance Architecture, Expressionism and so on. Yet at Massey things were different. There was not much art in the academic, essay writing side of things at all. Less than five percent of the course in critical theory was in painting, sculpture, video, performances, drawing or art work analysis in any form; it was in fact mostly marxist feminist politics, gender, sociology, psychology, semiology, linguistics, and so on- very politically motivated as both of the two lecturers in that 'faculty' or department were hard line Stalinist active in the local far left Mana party. It was like stepping back behind the Berlin wall into a Warsaw pact country. I almost immediately began questioning this party political propaganda; it was election year. This was however, how I began writing, in earnest. Finding out by the necessary research and written exploration exactly how and what feminism was working upon men. That was when writing and my writing about the male gender condition really got going.

Leading then to a pro-positive defence of men as a gender aware group in potential fully cognisant of its need for political awakening and consciousness of its own. Similar to and exactly equivalent to that of feminism for women.

 The lack is not alone a problem for hetero-sexual men but is part too of the internal politics of homosexual males within the LGBT community. Just hear Milo Yiannopolis on this for instance on his copious YouTube Videos. An unexpected ally for all men. 

 Questioning its suitability in a modern University teaching contemporary art; ironically the 'school style' for its studio staff was minimalist- my own career style- and they had patently never heard of me! Though I should have been considered the foremost historical philosophical personages in regard to New Zealand minimalism.  For my reductivist philosophy was exactly in line with my reductivist pieces. Whereas in New Zealand the fashion for minimalism arrived only by the time postmodernism 'everyist' relativism as a philosophy became here fashionable; so you can imagine the grotesque mismatches in younger artists talks (notably that of Stephen Bambury) framing minimalism in terms of speaking alongside and with its florid terms in postmodernist (decidedly non-reductivist) flamboyance. The fit was alarmingly mismatched. See my minimalist lifestyle, artworks and minimalist philosophy online. At Saatchi Art Online and other places. All ten years prior to Bambury. Many of the 'trade secret' things they sidled up to whisper to me I had discovered for myself nearly forty years prior. Otherwise it was a strictly ‘hands off’ non-prescriptive pedagogical method in the teaching. Help me! That method is designed to ‘enable the student to explore visual art options in an open informal manner’. In practice it meant not teaching anything useful like how to make an art career happen as this was exactly how their careers happened and did not want any competition!

After questioning the influence of critical theory for several years here at Massey and doing double time fashioning answering essays and videos and websites (but not submitting them) in other words I wrote the regular essays under sufferance- not agreeing with any of it, it was so easily questionable by asking obvious points from off the top of my head I virtually beat them every time, easily, I was so well read, having lived a shy life deep in my books and art, too easily without meaning to, just by asking for plain explanatory details- and for my own sanity had to reply online to satisfy myself: in a sense, if you can call it that, I enjoyed my intellectual agony as I finally saw where all those decades of political correctness came from- it lodged its hideaway home in my beloved art… I was ‘shocked and disgusted’, no wonder I did not get it before. Theory was not my thing; I was not attempting to become a critic, certainly not a biased, jealous, hypocritical one.

 

Student Rights to Unbiased Gender teaching.

Some student rebels are going one step further: organizing in favor of sexual restraint. Such newly created campus groups as the Love and Fidelity Network and the True Love Revolution advocate an alternative to the rampant regret sex of the hookup scene: wait until marriage. Their message would do more to return a modicum of manners to campus male—and female—behavior than endless harangues about the rape culture ever could.

Maybe these young iconoclasts can take up another discredited idea: college is for learning. The adults in charge have gone deaf to the siren call of beauty that for centuries lured people to the classics. But fighting male dominance or catering to the libidinal impulses released in the 1960s are sorry substitutes for the pursuit of knowledge. The campus rape and sex industries are signs of how hollow the university has become.

Words aplenty I had but mostly expressed in unpublished poetry and philosophical notations.

Finally ‘came out’ masculist as an artist and would-be-theorist of my own late in 2013, some precursors of which are shown in this text introduction. Have been busy writing website articles and essays ever since; probably upwards of 400,000 words


 

 

 

 

With almost a lifetime in teaching. Phillip O'Sullivan is a website writer who has obtained 12,000 unique visitors per month on his art and writing websites. This is around 150,000 unique website visitors in a year. Previously he had lectured at University level for one year. Having himself attended three universities at Canterbury, Victoria University and Massey University over a period of nine years.

He has written eighteen books two of which are obtainable on Amazon. These include: "Redeeming the Male Gaze", "Fighting for Survival; 12 Ways Feminists Fail the WEST", "Empowered Masculinity", "Testimony 11" – a memoir of high metaphysical Mystical phenomena in operation within the postmodern world today, "m a s c u l i s t Feminist", "Zealandia"- a dystopian exploration of alternative politics in future history.

He has two university degrees in Fine arts and in English literature.

Is among the top 10,000 writers on Amazon Kindle e-books for his books in the area of spirituality and metaphysical consciousness. His intellectual background is in a very wide reading of non-fiction including science and mathematics, economics and politics. Despite the 'arts' degrees. Several of his books at this stage tackle the extremely difficult area of gender politics and the feminist dominance of our intellectual understanding of ideology, sociology, psychology, consciousness, politics and of course history. The result of feminist thinking however seriously comes a cropper when you consider its effects on population and economics and the resultant upheavals of immigration and terrorism filling in the gap left by a vast feminist demographic absence. This elision of feminism is the cause of all our troubles. Terrorism and migration is really the symptom of what we ourselves have done. Many of my books examine precisely this issue.

However, there is another side to my writing which is more hopeful and in time will emerge more and more as we need to seek sustenance and nourishment from that spiritual consciousness that is only obtainable from true and genuine religious impulses.

Feminism Rapes Mens Consciousness

Sick  of fighting unjustified rearguard small outbreak fires again and again?  Miss getting at the root of the big blaze of our fierce accusers? To  put it out once and for all- for that we need theory. Masculist theory is the getting at the root of their fiery blaze. Radix means root- so what is needed is something Radical.

Radically  beyond the already excellent Professor Christina Hoff Sommers and Dr  Warren Farrell- for whom we can thank for their wonderful books “Who  Stole Feminism” (Sommers) and “The Myth of Male Power” (Farrell) which  both contain data and facts as ammunition in our fight against an  alienating divisive feminism. Their facts, analysis and descriptions of  the situation are excellent. However  the need for solutions and strategies, ways to combat false statistics,  false interpretations and misguided feminist policy are mostly lacking  within their writings. Such as provided seem tame compared to the fierce  claims, demands and  often false 'rights' (always without responsibilities) promoted by feminism exclusively for elite academic white women.

Masculist theory is an attempt to get at useful depths, meanings and outcomes for all men everywhere.
Radical masculist theory dispenses with feminist thinking entirely- we do not trust it.
Its  facts are ‘cherry picked’-you know what that is? It means they select  the very few isolated minority examples from a hundred question survey;  highlight ten in a report, all of these ten favour  the case they want to make; then out of the report further highlight  just the two very ‘best’ of all for their case presented in a press  release- this is what goes out to all the media. A simple communist like  propaganda exercise. Only this time all men suffer. We intend to ease, halt and reverse that suffering.

Phillip O'Sullivan

Cabinet of Culture  2014

Available Saatchi Art Com
$18,000

Naturally  the best data for any men's case is kept out of view in the seldom  seen, requested or viewed original full survey results. This is the  entirety of feminist data collecting methodology in a nutshell. Needless  to say all this is in womens  control. Thus all feminist data sources, information, surveys etc are  completely bogus. None are to be trusted. No men are included except by  accident. Thus all feminist data is skewed by over fifty percent from  the outset. As it simply fails to ask the men. A comical oversight that  renders almost all feminist philosophy illegitimate, poorly based and  with a fragile grasp on reality. Hence the hysteria, paranoia and  emotion driven  campaigns of feminism. Formed into institutions and social structures  its seeming great power is mostly smoke and mirrors. It is merely institutionalized bigotry, discrimination and prejudice against men. Feminism is a hate crime; pure and simple.
Women have supposed feminism to speak for all or some of them. Yet they too lack an all encompassing  attempt at a philosophy of a female gender. There is an attempt by  Professor Judith Butler of Columbia University to convey notions playing with  the idea of gender as a whole, where she says ‘gender is performative';  but this theatrical interpretation fails when we see, in contrast to  her theatrical 'performativity', that it is reified sexuality that is  ‘performative’ for we mark off the very body items that perform the  sexuality; ie ‘fisting’, ‘anal fisting’, ‘anal ”vaginal’, ‘full frontal’  'clitoral' 'phallic' 'caressing' 'sensuality' 'stroking' 'lingering',  'fingering ' 'tongue kiss' and so on.
Contrary to Butler then I can say gender is fixed in by the following definition; ’gender is that which engenders the next generation’. On that rock of course  the entirety of feminism, let alone Butler, completely founders. For  feminism like the personal inconsequentiality of its speakers, talkers  and otherwise practitioners has  no time consciousness, no sense of future responsibility like men have  for they never ask what is the long term bulk result of their temporary social  experiment. It is a mere movement  like Greenpeace: necessarily parasitic on the continued success of the  economics of both, what they call 'patriarchy', and of the much maligned  capitalism. Feminism is not an all-encompassing political system, it  cannot be, for it has no wider social vision nor a sense of future, nor  an economic system of its own; it is necessarily parasitic on both its  false targets. Feminism is a parasite of it favourite; 'patriarchy': and  of capitalism. That it could enforce its tyrannical will on men  highlights its truer dreadful roots in a matriarchal  super-owner-capitalism of usury and debt slavery. Its confluence with  Zionism is complete. Feminism is Zionism in drag. The slavery of all men  is its goal. The ultimate expression of power; the real desire, to rule  the world.

Getting MEN to the TOP OFF of GENDER

How to examine feminism for fun and profit.
Using the far superior masculist men's 'way of knowing'.

Here it is outlined.

The Methodology of the Men's LIBERATION REVOLUTION.

At the rate we are going we shall overtop all feminist 'voices' -the moaning whingeing  harpies- by the year 2022. See HERE.

USING EXACTLY AND ONLY THESE METHODS

I much favour the German 'thought experiment idea'- to create structures and intellectual frameworks for thinking- as my Forte' is not in the hard grind of research so much as in asking questions, posing more questions and possible answers toward thinking along the men's side of the fence. Sometimes I think this should be 'the man's side of the offence'- of Feminism; I do find it extremely bigotted and offensive; knowing the human condition, as it once was coyly called- such days of innocence- it could not ever seriously have been in any way the way feminism describved anything. Such evil little liars; 50/50 outcomes is absolutely the gold standard of plausibility here.

 Full Spectrum thinking

 masculist methodology.

A) pro and con.  For it, and against it.  Top and bottom.  Before after and other contrasts.

B) rules of evidence- as in forensic research and findings. We are after all at the scene of a massive crime: the Death Culture of feminist cultural and ethnic racist collapse; suicide and homocides of genocidal proportions. Time to show no mercy whatsoever. Did they?

C) who what where when why how?  Journalism's standby.

D) man and woman point of view: older men, younger boys children family singles gay?

E) government, political, economic, legal, education (propaganda) point of view, et cetera

F) what have we had it?  Did not have it?  What if it was all it?  What if there was none of it?  Take things to the extremes and contrast the two situations and see what it yields.

G) as if it were a crime?  Analysis?

Who gains/advantage?  Cf on paedophilia

whose opportunity?

What motivation?

What risk of discovery/capture?

What hard evidence?

Who was where when?  What is hearsay – i.e. in false rape accusation question mark

what outcomes are fair on agenda basis are they 50-50

do women – et cetera do it to?  Gaze?  Plus other untouchables?

H) Theoretical constructs – visualised using the tabletop model – top light; in a light or object light; shadow beneath; rakish light left; rakish right; rakish front rakish back; high light; low light – travelling eye light.  Along the ground, pacing the Terrain.  The map not being bigger than the country traversed.  The forest for the trees – the upper branches – tree top view- from the undergrowth – amidst the trees – point of view of a tree static – point of view of a vole or Kiwi.

I) things disallowed?  Invisible is – what are you not allowed to say?  What are you not allowed to examine?

Is there anything that people say do not go there?  Well, go there. Ask the unaskable- that is where the 10,000 PhD's of the future reside.

 

J) diplomatic aspects – what are the international implications and ramifications?

Anthropology/geographic/ethnic

et cetera opposites/comparisons/alternatives

absolute rakish tabletop view – go to the extremes and see what it looks like from their – go to the future 1000 years from now and imagine what it looks like from that aspect as to its consequences in terrible outcomes.  Say the thing that everybody is thinking, but nobody is saying.  You must say the word Jew if that is forbidden and you must say the word poofter if that is the word that is forbidden.  You must say the unsaleable words.it is the unsaleable words that are the most fertile for the new politics of the new future.  That is where the real power lies.  To say the unsaleable stop.  And then everyone will breathe a sigh of relief and be very grateful that at last, somebody has said the obvious thing that everybody knows but will not dare to say.

 K) Question absolutely EVERYONE- none are above reproach or close examination. Judges, Ministers, Governments, Parties, Academics- nothing at all is above such a huge human crime. Feminism is a hate crime with real blood on its hands.

 

 L) Military aspects; Retrospective aspoects. Crimes against the population, gender clensing, etc- no category at above consideration.